Detecting Hooked Syscalls

It's possible to enumerate which Windows API calls are hooked by an EDR using inline patching technique, where a jmp instruction is inserted at the beginning of the syscall stub to be hooked.

Related Notes


Function before Hooking

Below shows the stub for for NtReadVirtualMemory on a system with no EDR present, meaning the syscall NtReadVirtualMemory is not hooked:

We can see the NtReadVirtualMemory syscall stub starts with instructions:

00007ffc`d6dcc780 4c8bd1 mov r10,rcx
00007ffc`d6dcc783 b83f000000 mov eax,3Fh

The above applies to most routines starting with Zw, i.e ZwReadVirtualMemory too.

...which translates to the following 4 opcodes:

4c 8b d1 b8

4c 8b d1 b8 - are important for this lab - we will come back to this in a moment in a section Checking for Hooks.

Function after Hooking

Below shows an example of how NtReadVirtualMemory syscall stub looks like when it's hooked by an EDR:

Note that in this case, the first instruction is a jmp instruction, redirecting the code execution somewhere else (another module in the process's memory):

jmp 0000000047980084

...which translates to the following 5 opcodes:

e9 0f 64 f8 c7

e9 - opcode for near jump 0f64f8c7- offset, which is relative to the address of the current instruction, where the code will jump to

Checking for Hooks

Knowing that interesting functions/syscalls (that are often used in malware), starting with Nt | Zw, before hooking, start with opcodes: 4c 8b d1 b8, we can determine if a given function is hooked or not by following this process:

  1. Iterate through all the exported functions of the ntdll.dll

  2. Read the first 4 bytes of the the syscall stub and check if they start with 4c 8b d1 b8

    1. If yes, the function is not hooked

    2. If no, the function is most likely hooked (with a couple of exceptions mentioned in the False Positives callout).

Below is a simplified visual example attempting to further explaine the above process:

  1. NtReadVirtualMemory starts with opcodes e9 0f 64 f8 rather than 4c 8b d1 b8, meaning it's most likely hooked

  2. NtWriteVirtualMemory starts with opcodes 4c 8b d1 b8, meaning it has not been hooked

Hooked and unhooked functions

False Positives Although highly effective at detecting functions hooked with inline patching, this method returns a few false positives when enumerating hooked functions inside ntdll.dll, such as: NtGetTickCount NtQuerySystemTime NtdllDefWindowProc_A NtdllDefWindowProc_W NtdllDialogWndProc_A NtdllDialogWndProc_W ZwQuerySystemTime

The above functions are not hooked.


Below is the code that we can compile and run on an endpoint running an AV/EDR to see enumerate APIs that were most likely hooked:

#include <iostream>
#include <Windows.h>
int main()
PDWORD functionAddress = (PDWORD)0;
// Get ntdll base address
HMODULE libraryBase = LoadLibraryA("ntdll");
PIMAGE_NT_HEADERS imageNTHeaders = (PIMAGE_NT_HEADERS)((DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + dosHeader->e_lfanew);
// Locate export address table
DWORD_PTR exportDirectoryRVA = imageNTHeaders->OptionalHeader.DataDirectory[IMAGE_DIRECTORY_ENTRY_EXPORT].VirtualAddress;
PIMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY imageExportDirectory = (PIMAGE_EXPORT_DIRECTORY)((DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + exportDirectoryRVA);
// Offsets to list of exported functions and their names
PDWORD addresOfFunctionsRVA = (PDWORD)((DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + imageExportDirectory->AddressOfFunctions);
PDWORD addressOfNamesRVA = (PDWORD)((DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + imageExportDirectory->AddressOfNames);
PWORD addressOfNameOrdinalsRVA = (PWORD)((DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + imageExportDirectory->AddressOfNameOrdinals);
// Iterate through exported functions of ntdll
for (DWORD i = 0; i < imageExportDirectory->NumberOfNames; i++)
// Resolve exported function name
DWORD functionNameRVA = addressOfNamesRVA[i];
DWORD_PTR functionNameVA = (DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + functionNameRVA;
char* functionName = (char*)functionNameVA;
// Resolve exported function address
DWORD_PTR functionAddressRVA = 0;
functionAddressRVA = addresOfFunctionsRVA[addressOfNameOrdinalsRVA[i]];
functionAddress = (PDWORD)((DWORD_PTR)libraryBase + functionAddressRVA);
// Syscall stubs start with these bytes
char syscallPrologue[4] = { 0x4c, 0x8b, 0xd1, 0xb8 };
// Only interested in Nt|Zw functions
if (strncmp(functionName, (char*)"Nt", 2) == 0 || strncmp(functionName, (char*)"Zw", 2) == 0)
// Check if the first 4 instructions of the exported function are the same as the sycall's prologue
if (memcmp(functionAddress, syscallPrologue, 4) != 0) {
printf("Potentially hooked: %s : %p\n", functionName, functionAddress);
return 0;


Below is a snippet of the output of the program compiled from the above source code and run on a system with an EDR present. It shows some of the interesting functions (not all displayed) that are most likely hooked, with an exception of NtGetTickCount, which is a false positive, as mentioned earlier:

Usual suspects hooked + some false positives


After I've posted this note on my twitter, I got the following reply from Derek Rynd:

Derek is suggesting to check if the syscall instruction itself is not hooked. The syscall handler routine (responsible for locating functions in the SSDT based on a syscall number) location can be found by reading the Model Specific Register (MSR) at location 0xc0000082 and confirming that the address stored there points to nt!KiSystemCall64Shadow.

Below shows how this could be done manually in WinBDG:

lkd> rdmsr c0000082
msr[c0000082] = fffff803`24a13180
lkd> u fffff803`24a13180
fffff803`24a13180 0f01f8 swapgs
fffff803`24a13183 654889242510900000 mov qword ptr gs:[9010h],rsp